Choosing Freedom Over Fear
This article will count 0.25 units (15 minutes) of unverifiable CPD. Remember to log these units under your membership profile.
Most accountants do not encounter unlawful conduct with certainty or drama. It usually arrives quietly: a transaction that does not make sense, an explanation that feels incomplete, or information that leaves lingering discomfort long after the numbers have been checked. In those moments, the question is rarely whether something is wrong, but what responsibility follows once the concern has been recognised. Many practitioners assume that raising the issue and, if necessary, walking away is enough. In some cases, it is not. Understanding why requires clarity about confidentiality, professional boundaries, and the role NOCLAR plays in protecting both the public interest and the accountant.
Understanding your responsibilities when unlawful conduct surfaces
Most professional accountants will encounter this moment at least once in their careers: a transaction that does not align with expectations, an explanation that feels incomplete, or information that raises quiet but persistent concern. These moments are rarely dramatic. More often, they arrive subtly and leave the practitioner sitting with discomfort rather than certainty.
What makes these situations particularly difficult is not a lack of integrity. It is the absence of clarity about what, precisely, is expected next.
Why These Situations Feel So Unsettling
Accountants are trained to be accurate, measured, and discreet. They are not trained to be investigators, law enforcement officers, or whistle-blowers. When potential unlawful conduct surfaces, the instinctive professional response is usually practical and restrained: seek clarification, raise the issue with the appropriate party, and, if the matter cannot be resolved, disengage.
In many professional contexts, that approach would be sufficient. When non-compliance with laws and regulations is involved, however, it may not be.
Confidentiality: Real, but Often Misunderstood
Professional accountants owe a duty of confidentiality to their clients and employers. This duty is fundamental to the profession. It supports trust, protects sensitive information, and underpins the working relationship between accountant and client.
What is often misunderstood is the nature of that duty. Confidentiality is an ethical obligation arising from professional standards. It is not the same as legal privilege. That distinction rarely matters in routine work, but it becomes critically important when matters escalate.
Why Confidentiality Is Not Legal Privilege
Legal professional privilege allows certain communications to be withheld from disclosure in legal proceedings. This protection applies to legal advisers acting in that capacity. Accountants, even when providing tax, regulatory, or compliance advice, do not enjoy the same protection.
This does not mean that accountants operate without safeguards or that confidentiality is meaningless. What it does mean is that information and communications may be subject to lawful disclosure when required. Understanding this difference early allows practitioners to respond thoughtfully rather than react defensively when difficult issues arise.
Why the Response Framework Exists
The framework for responding to non-compliance with laws and regulations exists to support professional accountants, not to punish them. It provides a structured and proportionate way to deal with situations that are often emotionally charged and professionally risky.
The framework helps practitioners understand what they have encountered, raise concerns responsibly, allow organisations an opportunity to respond, and escalate matters only when necessary. Crucially, it recognises that accountants are not investigators. Their role is not to prove wrongdoing, but to respond appropriately once concerns have been identified.
The Importance of Following the Sequence
The framework is deliberately sequential. Each step builds clarity, context, and protection for the practitioner. It begins with understanding the matter and discussing it with appropriate levels of management. It then requires an assessment of whether the response received is adequate. Only where responses are absent or insufficient does escalation become necessary, including consideration of external disclosure.
Each step creates a professional record of how the accountant responded once the issue became known. Stopping too early in the process, even with good intentions, can leave matters unresolved and expose the practitioner to unnecessary risk.
Why Quiet Withdrawal Can Be Misinterpreted
In practice, many accountants choose to disengage when concerns remain unresolved. This decision is often taken in good faith and with a strong sense of professional integrity. However, disengagement alone does not address the underlying non-compliance, nor does it demonstrate how the accountant responded to the risk once identified.
Following the framework ensures that concerns are properly considered, escalation is evident, and the accountant’s role is clearly documented. This is not about punishment or blame. It is about professional protection as much as compliance.
When Reporting Becomes Necessary
The framework does not require reporting in every case. It does require practitioners to consider reporting where non-compliance is serious, where harm may be substantial, and where internal responses are inadequate or absent.
In these circumstances, reporting is not a breakdown of the professional relationship. It is the fulfilment of a professional responsibility. Importantly, disclosures made in good faith through appropriate channels are recognised and protected in law.
NOCLAR as a Professional Safeguard
Seen properly, NOCLAR is not about confrontation or accusation. It is about clarity, consistency, and protection of both the public interest and the professional accountant. It replaces uncertainty, fear, and instinctive decision-making with a defensible process grounded in professional standards.
Rather than asking practitioners to act bravely, it asks them to act methodically.
A Practical Reality for Practitioners
For business accountants and practitioners, particularly those in small or independent practices, these situations often feel deeply personal. Client relationships matter. Reputation matters. Income matters. For many practitioners, these decisions also carry family and community consequences.
That is precisely why a clear and principled framework is essential. It removes the burden of isolated personal judgment and replaces it with professional process.
A Measured Conclusion
Most accountants do not struggle with integrity. They struggle with uncertainty about where confidentiality ends, when escalation is required, and how far responsibility extends.
Understanding the distinction between confidentiality and legal privilege, and applying the NOCLAR framework as intended, allows practitioners to navigate these situations with confidence rather than anxiety. Walking away may feel like the safest option in the moment. Following the framework ensures that it truly is.
Join CIBA and we’ll help you navigate these moments with confidence
CIBA supports business accountants in applying professional standards practically and safely. We help you understand your obligations, escalate concerns appropriately, report when required, and protect your career while acting in the public interest.
Professional standards explain what is required. CIBA helps you understand how to apply them well.
Join CIBA — and never face these decisions alone.
