SARS Wins in Court After Tax Deadline Mix-Up with Virgin Mobile

This article will count 0.25 units (15 minutes) of unverifiable CPD. Remember to log these units under your membership profile.

Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Virgin Mobile South Africa (Pty) Ltd

The Supreme Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of SARS in a legal dispute with Virgin Mobile South Africa about a missed deadline in a tax case.

The Backstory

SARS raised extra tax assessments for Virgin Mobile for 2014 to 2016. Virgin Mobile challenged them and SARS had 45 days to respond—but missed the deadline. Virgin Mobile warned SARS and gave them more time. SARS then submitted the required documents, but Virgin still went ahead and applied for a default judgment (essentially, trying to win the case because SARS was late).

SARS objected, saying it had already corrected the issue and that the case should move forward normally. Lower courts disagreed. So SARS appealed to the Supreme Court.

What did the court say?

The court said Virgin Mobile’s move for default judgment was wrong. SARS had complied in time after the warning. Once that happens, the process is supposed to continue, no need for extra steps or punishment.

Key Takeaways

Know the Rules, But Don’t Fear a Missed Step. Compliance Can Still Save You:

• Stay sharp on deadlines, but know that fixing an error on time protects your client.

• Push back on unfair procedural moves, you don’t have to accept a default judgment if you’ve complied.

• Use Rule 56 as a compliance trigger, not a trap, it’s there to move things forward, not end the game.

This case is a reminder that in tax disputes, substance matters more than technical missteps. Even if a deadline is missed, correcting it within the allowed follow-up window keeps the door open, no need for panic or extra applications.

In practice, if your client or SARS misses a step, what matters most is whether they fixed it before a final judgment. This ruling gives you confidence to defend fair process, and not let admin slip-ups derail tax justice.

Read the Media Summary of the case here.