Customs Rule Update: Movement of Vehicles Just Got Easier

This article will count 0.25 units (15 minutes) of unverifiable CPD. Remember to log these units under your membership profile.

SARS has proposed a practical amendment to Rule 64D.04 aiming to actually reduce friction. Below is what you need to know:

1️⃣ What the rule currently does

Rule 64D.04 sets out when goods can be moved without using a licensed remover of goods in bond — a process that is usually admin-heavy, time-consuming, and costly.

2️⃣ What’s changing

SARS is proposing to expand these exemptions. The key addition:

👉 Locally manufactured vehicles can now be moved under their own power (i.e. driven, not transported) between premises. This adds another exemption where a licensed remover is not required.

3️⃣ But there are conditions

This is not a free-for-all. The exemption only applies if:

• The movement is done by the same licensed manufacturer

• Both premises fall under the same customs and excise license

• The premises are within 30km of each other

• The vehicle is driven under the control/instruction of the licensee.

4️⃣ Why this matters

This is a small but meaningful shift:

• 🚚 Reduces logistics costs (no need for transporters)

• ⏱ Saves time on internal movements

• 📉 Cuts compliance admin for manufacturers.

In short: SARS is removing a bottleneck in the production and distribution process.

5️⃣ What to watch

This is still a draft amendment.

📅 Deadline for comment: 6 April 2026

If you have clients in manufacturing — especially automotive — this is worth reviewing and potentially commenting on. Comments on rules to be recorded on the Customs & Excise Rule Amendments Comment Sheet.

The bigger picture

This is the kind of reform the profession has been asking for:

• Less red tape

• More practical compliance

• Rules that actually reflect how businesses operate.