Spotting Financial Statement Fraud: The Red Flags You Can Actually See
This article will count 0.25 units (15 minutes) of unverifiable CPD. Remember to log these units under your membership profile.
Financial statement fraud does not always start with a complicated scheme or a fake set of books. Sometimes, it starts with something much simpler.
A company is having a bad year. Management is under pressure to meet a profit target. A loan agreement requires the business to maintain certain financial results. A director's bonus depends on profit. Suddenly, there is a strong temptation to make the numbers look just a little better.
A sale is recorded early. An expense is moved to the balance sheet. A provision is reduced. Stock is valued a little too generously.
One adjustment may not look significant. But when these adjustments start adding up, the financial statements can tell a very different story from what is actually happening in the business.
So, what should you look for?
Start with a simple question: Where is the cash?
One of the easiest warning signs to understand is the difference between profit and cash.
Imagine a company reports a profit of R10 million. Sales are growing and, according to the income statement, business is booming.
But the bank account is constantly under pressure. Suppliers are not being paid on time. The overdraft is increasing and the company keeps borrowing money.
That should immediately raise a question:
If the business is making so much money, where is the cash?
Profit and cash will never match perfectly. There are many legitimate reasons for differences. But if profits keep increasing year after year while operating cash flow remains weak or negative, it deserves attention.
It could mean that sales have been recorded but customers are not paying. It could also mean that expenses are being kept out of the income statement.
The numbers are telling two different stories.
Watch what happens just before year-end
Fraud and manipulation often become easier to spot around reporting dates.
Suppose a company's normal monthly sales are around R5 million. Then, suddenly, it records R12 million in sales during the final month of the year.
That does not automatically mean fraud. Perhaps December really was an exceptional month.
But now look at January.
If there are large credit notes, returns or cancelled invoices shortly after year-end, you have a much more interesting situation.
The business may have recorded sales before year-end simply to increase revenue and profit, only to reverse them afterwards.
A practical test is to select the largest sales recorded during the final days of the financial year. Check the customer order, invoice and proof of delivery. Then check whether the customer actually paid after year-end.
You are trying to answer one basic question:
Was this a real sale?
Debtors can tell you a lot
Another warning sign is when trade receivables, or debtors, are increasing much faster than sales.
Imagine sales increased by 10%, but debtors increased by 60%.
Why?
Perhaps customers are simply taking longer to pay. But there could be another explanation: some of those sales may not be genuine, or management may be refusing to write off customers that are unlikely to pay.
Look at the age analysis.
If large balances have been outstanding for 90, 120 or even 180 days, ask why they are still considered recoverable.
Then look at what happened after year-end.
Did the customer eventually pay?
Actual cash received from a customer is far stronger evidence than an explanation that "the customer promised to pay."
Look for expenses hiding on the balance sheet
Sometimes fraud is not about creating fake income. It is about making real expenses disappear.
A business may take normal operating expenses and record them as assets.
For example, imagine a company spends R2 million on repairs, salaries, consulting or marketing. Normally, these costs may need to be recognised as expenses.
Instead, management records the R2 million as "development costs", "work in progress" or another asset.
The cash has still been spent, but the expense has disappeared from the income statement.
Profit suddenly looks R2 million better.
Pay particular attention to unusual increases in assets with vague descriptions such as:
"Other assets", "projects in progress", "sundry debtors", "prepayments" or "development costs".
Ask what is actually sitting in those accounts and request supporting documents.
Strange journal entries deserve attention
Manual journal entries can be one of the best places to look for unusual activity.
Be particularly interested in large journals processed close to year-end.
For example:
Dr Asset R3,000,000
Cr Expense R3,000,000
Description: "Year-end adjustment – per FD"
That does not prove anything is wrong, but it certainly deserves an explanation.
Look for journals that are unusually large, contain round numbers, have vague descriptions or were processed late at night, over weekends or after the reporting period had supposedly closed.
Also ask who processed and approved them.
If a senior person can create, process and approve a major adjustment without anyone independently checking it, the risk is much higher.
Pay attention to documents that don't feel right
Fraud often leaves small clues in supporting documents.
An invoice may use a different font halfway down the page. A supplier's invoice numbers may run perfectly in sequence even though the supplier supposedly deals with hundreds of customers. Several different suppliers may mysteriously use the same address or bank account.
Sometimes the supporting documents simply never arrive.
You repeatedly hear:
"The contract is being located."
"The delivery note is with operations."
"We'll send that tomorrow."
A delay does not prove fraud. But repeated delays, changing explanations and missing documents around the same transactions should not be ignored.
Look at the people as well as the numbers
Financial fraud is committed by people, so behaviour matters.
A finance manager who never takes leave may look dedicated. But it can also be a warning sign if nobody else is allowed to perform their duties.
A CFO who becomes defensive every time certain accounts are questioned is worth noticing.
So is management that tries to control who auditors speak to or insists that all requests must go through one senior person.
Another practical warning sign is an employee whose lifestyle appears significantly different from what you would reasonably expect from their position. Expensive cars, properties and luxury holidays do not prove fraud, but unexplained wealth can justify further investigation when other red flags are already present.
Also pay attention to staff turnover.
If accountants, financial managers, internal auditors or external auditors keep leaving, ask why.
Related parties can hide in plain sight
Always pay attention to companies connected to directors, employees or their family members.
Suppose a business suddenly starts buying large amounts from a new supplier.
Check the supplier.
Who owns it? Where is it registered? Does it have employees? Does it have a real operating address? Does its bank account or contact information match anyone working for the company?
Sometimes a supposedly independent supplier or customer is not independent at all.
Comparing supplier and customer master data against employee information can uncover matching bank accounts, phone numbers or addresses.
That simple exercise can reveal relationships that were never disclosed.
One red flag is not proof
This is important.
A large year-end sale is not automatically fraudulent. A profitable company can have poor cash flow. A missing document can genuinely be missing. An employee can own an expensive car for completely innocent reasons.
Red flags tell you where to look, not what conclusion to reach.
The real concern starts when several warning signs appear together.
Profit is increasing, but cash is falling. Debtors are growing rapidly. Large sales appear just before year-end. Credit notes follow in January. Management cannot provide delivery notes. A large manual journal was processed by the financial director. And the finance team becomes defensive when questions are asked.
Individually, each item may have an explanation.
Together, they tell you that it is time to dig deeper.
Follow the story behind the numbers
The most useful fraud detection tool is often not a complicated formula. It is professional curiosity.
Ask simple questions.
Why did this balance increase?
Who is this customer?
Why has this debtor not paid?
What exactly is this asset?
Who approved this journal?
Where is the contract?
Did the goods actually leave the warehouse?
Did the customer actually pay?
Financial statements tell a story about a business.
When the reported story says the company is growing, profitable and financially strong, but the cash, documents, transactions and behaviour of the people tell a different story, that difference deserves attention.
Because sometimes the first sign of financial statement fraud is simply that the numbers look good, but the business does not.
Choose Your Path to Exclusive Insights
Stay ahead in the world of accounting with premium content designed for professionals like you. Access expert articles, industry trends, and essential resources. Become a CIBA member and claim your CPD hours from CIBA.
CIBA Member Access
R250.00 FREE!
100% Discount when you become a CIBA Member. Join now to claim your CPD Hours. Register here: https://accounts.myciba.org/register
Premium
R250.00
Every month
Trending
